On Feb. 13, 2013, a year-and-a-half after Lauren Astley’s murder, her ex-boyfriend Nathaniel Fujita’s test started.
“there is two people that are different” buddy Genevieve Flynn stated. “there is, like, the Nate that has been in senior high school with us, who had been, like, within my homeroom, that would joke around beside me, who was simply regarding the track group beside me. There’s that Nate. Then there is, like, the Nate whom we have actually just actually present in handcuffs as well as in a court room.”
Asked just exactly how he seemed in court, buddy Hannah Blahut told Smith, “He mostly kept their face down. As soon as he looked up, he seemed simply not like any Nate that we’d ever understood.”
Prosecutor Lisa McGovern wastes no right amount of time in spelling down why Lauren ended up being murdered.
“This defendant is responsible just as charged,” McGovern addressed the court in her own opening declaration.
“Nathaniel Fujita ended up being harmed by Lauren Astley maybe perhaps not returning to him and then he killed her,” McGovern told “48 Hours”
Defense lawyer William Sullivan, in their opening statement, admits Nathaniel killed Lauren.
“In many murder instances, the real question is whom? Whom achieved it? That is not this instance,” the told the court. “This case there’s– there is gonna be two concerns, why and exactly how. “
“How exactly does a man that is young . there is no actual proof of him ever laying a little finger with this girl that is young . so how exactly does he take action similar to this?” Sullivan remarked to Tracy Smith. “we told the jury, ‘you’re gonna notice to see some extremely annoying facts.'”
“. she passed away as a consequence of the blend for the strangulation as well as the incised wounds . to her throat,” health Examiner Henry Nields testified.
Nields stated after Lauren ended up being strangled having a bungee cable, she then suffered wide range of shallow wounds to her throat before her neck had been cut.
“Why these shallow, shallow wounds? He did that to harm her,” McGovern told “48 Hours”. “Why did he provide the gaping, deep injury? He did that to destroy her.”
The prosecution questioned Genevieve Flynn and Lauren’s other buddies about June 2011 — the thirty days between twelfth grade graduation and Lauren’s murder.
“we saw Lauren select up her fingers and push them down her part as if she had been saying, simply keep away from me personally,” Hannah testified.
Hannah Blahut testified about this graduation celebration where Nathaniel punched a pole keeping within the ongoing celebration tent.
“Nate got furious that Lauren was not speaking with him,” close friend Chloe Jacques told “48 Hours”. “He had been aggressive because he had been extremely drunk.”
McGovern thinks Nathaniel’s display of rage had been a prelude that is ominous killing Lauren.
“this will be a violence murder that is domestic. This is perpetrated because of this relationship, that has been a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship,” McGovern told “48 Hours.”
“The prosecution is painting this as a domestic violence that is violence-dating,” Smith noted to Sullivan. “Correct,” he responded.
However the protection disagrees.
“Nathaniel . did not stalk her. Did not drive by her home. Was not calling her. Was not texting her. And none of this was present,” Sullivan told Smith.
The protection wishes the jury to pay attention to Nathaniel’s behavior after graduation prior to Lauren’s murder:
Bill Sullivan: through that right time those three days, be fair to state you did not begin to see the defendant at all.
R.J. Bolivar: I do not think therefore.
“their buddies was in fact saying they did not would you like to go out because he had been acting differently,” Chloe told “48 Hours” with him anymore.
Bill Sullivan: he is maybe maybe perhaps not spending time with you dudes anymore, right?
Connor Murphy: Appropriate.
Friends Connor and R.J. testify Nathaniel had dropped from their social group.
Bill Sullivan: will it be reasonable to express that individuals were commenting that Nathaniel was not around?
R.J. Bolivar: Some everyone was, yeah.